|
|
||||||
Greetings!
If you're a Sales executive who's struggled to attract or retain the talent you need owing to uncompetitive pay levels or if you're an HR executive who spends too much time analyzing survey data that your internal Sales clients dismiss, then this month's newsletter is for you. Like last month's article, this is another excerpt taken from my upcoming book that highlights a number of different inputs that should be considered in establishing target pay levels for Sales jobs. Specifically, it provides guidance for working around what is often a source of frustration; i.e., the lack of credible external benchmark data. I hope you find this article of value. Don't hesitate to share with me the topics you'd be interested in reading about in future newsletters. Best regards, |
||||||
|
||||||
| by J. Mark Davis |
Getting Around the Lack of
Credible External Benchmarks
The process of establishing a competitive target pay level for Sales jobs tends to get a lot of air time. HR folks often spend countless hours searching for or culling through available survey data, while their Sales counterparts spend a lot of time debunking the survey data that HR provides as being out of touch with the realities of the market. Sound familiar? Two mistakes are being made in this scenario. The first is HR’s over-reliance on survey data and the second is sales management’s over-reliance on the information they glean from the “street.” The target cash compensation (TCC) amount reflects the economic value of a job. As such, it is a critical decision point in the design of a sales compensation plan. TCC is the annual cash compensation amount paid for achievement of expected levels of performance (i.e., 100% of quota). TCC is comprised of two components: 1) base salary at the midpoint of the salary range and 2) the target incentive compensation (TIC) earned for performance at 100% on all performance goals or quotas. There is frequently an unproductive preoccupation on the part of Sales and HR executives with determining what the competitive labor market pays for a given job. It is unproductive, in part, because all too often, credible external survey sources or benchmarks simply do not exist, particularly on an industry-specific basis. It also is unproductive because, in the process of searching for hard-to-find survey data, other critical inputs to the TCC discussion are often overlooked. Key TTC Inputs There are a number of potential inputs to establishing an appropriate TCC amount, including:
Survey Says... There is no single source of data that should stand alone as the sole input to determining a sales job’s TCC level. Yes, some inputs will likely be more credible than others, but be open to a variety of contributing factors in the decision making process. The most common mistake I see in this process is to view pay surveys as the only viable source of information. Even if you have access to reliable survey sources, it is particularly important to leverage insights from field sales managers in terms current market conditions that may not yet be reflected in the survey data. |
|||||
|
||||||
| Opportunities to Invest in Your Learning and Development! Attend one of the sessions of the WorldatWork course that Mark teaches, "Sales Compensation for Complex Selling Models," on October 1, 2007 in Brussels, Belgium or on November 14, 2007 in Chicago. (Get details...) Or, see Mark speak at the Sales Performance Management Conference in San Diego, November 11 - 14. (Get details...) | ||||||
|
||||||
Mark Davis is a contributing author to The
Sales Compensation Handbook – Second
Edition. Order this seminal text on
Amazon.com.
|
||||||
|
||||||
| by Alvin Toffler |
"You
can use all of the quantitative data you can get, but
you still have to distrust it and use your own intelligence
and judgment."
|
|||||
|
||||||
![]() |
||